Below we have a selection of projects and initiatives that we have organised and completed before 2020.
Youth Exchange Germany — Fiji (2017)
Fiji is one of the countries suffering most from climate change. The sensitive ecosystem of the island state is threatened by rising sea levels, changing rainfall and storm surges. Since 1993, the Pacific sea level here has risen by an average of six millimetres per year, almost 15 centimetres more than the global average. If nothing is done, the water will probably be 1.40 metres higher by the end of the century.
The 23rd World Climate Conference took place in November 2017, at which the implementation of the Paris Climate Change Agreement of 2015 was further negotiated. The conference took place at the headquarters of the Secretariat of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change in Bonn, Germany. For many Fijians, the conference was about taking the concerns of the Pacific Islanders seriously.
In a German-Fijian youth exchange programme, young environmental activists were able to see for themselves how climate change shapes everyday life in Fiji and Germany. The measure aimed to promote the exchange of young people and young adults on climate protection measures across national borders. Fifteen young committed people each from Germany and Fiji met representatives from politics, science and civil society. They learned about the risks, vulnerability and adaptation measures in the respective countries. As the climax and conclusion of the exchange, the young activists took part in the climate conference in Bonn and worked together to advocate more consistent climate protection. The exchange attracted media attention throughout Germany for climate change and its significance for countries such as Fiji. The exchange was organised by the Foundation for the Rights of Future Generations, the climate delegation of the Future Energy Youth Alliance and Project Survival Pacific Youth from Fiji and was financed by the Federal Ministry for the Environment.
For the people of Fiji and many other regions of the world, climate change means the struggle for survival and the fight for their homeland: rising sea levels flood villages and fields and endanger the population’s livelihood and food supply. As the world’s first village, the inhabitants of Fijian Vunidogoloa were resettled in 2012 due to climate change.
The oceans, which play an important role in climate regulation, are warming up and the habitat for fish and other marine animals and plants is changing dramatically. The rising temperatures of the seas also have a noticeable impact on land, because warm seas often result in extreme weather conditions such as hurricanes. In February 2016, tropical cyclone Winston devastated large parts of the Republic of Fiji. It was the strongest cyclone ever to hit the island state. The economic losses are estimated at more than half a billion US dollars — about a third of the annual gross domestic product.
We want to vote!
Children and young people did not have a vote in the 2013 federal elections. Millions of people in Germany are excluded from voting rights - simply because they are under 18 years of age. Because this violates the principles of democracy and popular sovereignty, the FRFG, together with children and young people, launched the initiative “We want to vote!”.
In 2014, 15 children and young people aged between 10 and 17 filed a complaint with the Federal Constitutional Court to abolish the minimum voting age in order to strengthen democracy and intergenerational justice. They were supported by the FRFG and the children’s initiative Plant-for-the-Planet. The complaint was legally accompanied by the lawyer Prof. Michael Quaas.
The objection was rejected by the Bundestag on May 8, 2014. Subsequently, the FRFG filed an appeal with the Federal Constitutional Court in 2014.
On the occasion of the submission of the constitutional complaint, a press conference was held in Berlin on 15 July 2014 at which FRFG spokespersons Wolfgang Gründinger, Renate Schmidt (former Federal Minister for Family Affairs), Jens Spahn (CDU member of the Bundestag), Felix Finkbeiner (co-plaintiff; Plant-for-the-Planet) and Dr. Lore Maria Peschel-Gutzeit (former Senator for Justice) answered the journalists’ questions.
After long deliberations, the judges dismissed the appeal in April 2016.
Intergenerational Justice in the German Constitution (2005–2009)
On the initiative of FRFG, members of parliament from the CDU, SPD, FDP and Green Party drafted a cross-party motion to enshrine intergenerational justice in the German constitution.
Jens Spahn (CDU), Peter Friedrich (SPD), Anna Lührmann (Green Party) and Michael Kauch (FDP) formulated a joint proposal in several meetings, moderated by the FRFG. The FRFG also convened renowned constitutional lawyers to help in proceedings. The proposal, presented on 14 July 2006, called for the state to be assigned a new function in Article 20b of the Basic Law (the German constitution): “The state must observe the principle of sustainability in its actions and protect the interests of future generations”.
Article 109(2) was also reworked to limit borrowing by federal and state governments. It read: “Federal and state governments must take into account the macroeconomic balance, sustainability and the interests of future generations in their budgetary planning”. The FRFG pressed for a more far-reaching solution but the representatives could not agree on one.
The bill was submitted to the Bundestag on 22 November 2006 by 104 members of parliament of all age groups and from four parties. Almost a year later, on 11 October 2007, the motion was debated in the plenary session of the German Bundestag and was subsequently referred to the Legal Affairs Committee for further deliberation and delayed for further discussion. It was ultimately not adopted.
The Parliamentary Advisory Council for Sustainable Development finally took the lead and in October 2008 convened an expert hearing at which Dr. Dr. Jörg Tremmel of the FRFG was also present.
Following the banking and financial crisis in 2009 and their various stimulus packages, the foundation urged that the members only agree to a debt brake being introduced into the Basic Law that went beyond what had been discussed in 2006. The debt brake was enshrined in the constitution in the spring of 2009.